A single, board-level operating view for an Integrated Health Organisation and its strategic commissioners. Not a passive activity report — a decision surface that measures whether people are getting healthier, getting access earlier, experiencing less inequality, receiving better-value care, and whether the workforce is spending time helping people rather than navigating broken systems — then says where to deploy resources next. Know where to act. Prove what changed. Reduce the gap.
A persistent board scorecard sits above the whole product — each tile a named query that drills to exactly the people behind it. Outcomes, access, inequality, value, workforce, flow, prevention, experience, resource-deployment — and, when the VUIT partner layer is on, partner-supported outcomes.
% of people improved / stabilised / deteriorated, goal achievement, independence and escalation avoided — did the intervention change the trajectory?
Every access and outcome measure splits by deprivation / Core20, PLUS group and protected characteristics; the gap indicators make it actionable.
Value is outcome per unit of resource, not activity volume; the Resource Impact Score ranks where to deploy next; VUIT adds measured social value.
The most important question is not “how much activity happened?” but “did the person’s trajectory change?” commvita measures the cohort’s path against the path it was on, and shows how the whole population’s outcome mix moves over time.
Core20PLUS5 is built in as the default inequality lens — the most-deprived 20%, locally-identified PLUS groups and the five priority clinical areas (maternity, severe mental illness, chronic respiratory disease, early cancer diagnosis, hypertension). Inequality is expressed as gap indicators so it can be acted on, not just noted:
Difference in referral-to-support time, contact success / DNA and who receives proactive support — between the most and least advantaged groups.
Difference in outcome improvement and in crisis-escalation rates — is the system leaving the same cohorts behind clinically?
Difference in portal / digital completion and in experience (PREM) between cohorts — so “access by who-can-navigate-the-system” is surfaced.
The standout capability for a commissioner: Resource Deployment Recommendations. Value is expressed as outcome per unit of resource (not crude cost-cutting); a Resource Impact Score ranks every cohort, locality and pathway; a four-quadrant view triages priority; and each row carries a Start / Scale / Redesign / Stop / Shift / Partner action with a confidence level.
Resource Impact Score = need + deterioration risk + inequality gap + avoidable demand + outcome potential + workforce burden − delivery complexity. It ranks where to act next.
A composite of duplicate data entry, repeated assessment, referral chase, manual coordination, rejected referrals, missing information and cross-system delay — don’t use people as the workaround for siloed systems.
Start (unmet need) · Scale (strong outcomes & value) · Redesign (high activity, poor outcomes) · Stop (low value) · Shift (crisis→prevention) · Partner (route social need to voluntary/community capacity).
For an IHO and its commissioners, commvita brings three complementary lenses over one operational record — nothing duplicated — and a partner layer that closes the loop from insight to delivery.
The board decision surface: population & risk, outcomes, access & inequality, value & resource deployment, workforce experience.
The NHS 10 Year Plan three shifts — Digital · Community · Prevention — as a maturity index, with an equity modifier so the shift doesn’t widen inequality.
The whole system as one production line bound by Little’s Law, with live binding-constraint detection and OPEL — so pressure and its cause are visible.
VUIT is visible four ways: a destination for support (referrals, uptake, completion); a contributor to outcomes (partner-attributed improvement, escalation reduction); an inequality reducer (reaching Core20 / PLUS / digitally-excluded / isolated groups); and a value contributor (lower-cost non-clinical support preventing higher-cost clinical demand). It is Live today — API-backed via a normalised partner adapter, behind a fail-safe feature flag.
| Capability | What it answers for the IHO / commissioner | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome Intelligence | Outcomes, access & inequality (Core20PLUS5), value & resource deployment, workforce — and where to deploy next | ● Demonstrated |
| VUIT partner layer | Partner referrals, uptake, completion, partner-attributed outcomes, social value + the Partner recommendation | ● Live |
| LeftShift | Digital / Community / Prevention shift maturity, equity modifier, board pack | ● Demonstrated |
| Flow | Whole-system production line, binding constraint, OPEL, demand classification | ● Demonstrated |
Non-SaMD. Aggregate / segment analytics + resource-deployment decision-support; no automated individual clinical decision. Special-category data used only where lawfully collected; k≥5 suppression on anything published; value figures are configurable estimates, labelled as such. Commissioners and clinicians make the decisions.