Brand · round two

Keep the dots. Keep the colour. Change what actually gives it away.

The first pass was the wrong prescription. Muting the palette and putting a serif on it made it drab and old, which is a worse problem than the one it solved. Colour and modernity are not what make a brand look generated — default choices are. The same mint-and-coral triad, the same Inter, the same tracked-mono eyebrow, the same card grid. So this round keeps the mark joining the dots, gives the palette more colour rather than less, and makes the type newer rather than older.

Outcome, 2 August 2026. Option C — Constellation — was adopted and has shipped. The mark shown below as previous is retired, and the palette beside it (#1D3461, #3ECFBE, #F07043, #F7FAFC) is retired with it — those four literals are now checked absent from the product on every build. They are kept on this page deliberately: this page is the argument for replacing them, and rewriting them would leave a comparison with nothing on one side.

1 · What is actually wrong

Five countable habits, none of them colour.

Em dashes, one every 74 words. Edited prose runs one every 400 to 600.115
“Not X, but Y” negations — the loudest tic in the copy71
Rounded cards, every one the same radius and shadow34
Card labels in tracked uppercase mono32
Screens with an identical eyebrow, headline, lead, grid rhythm27

Fix these five and the brand can be as colourful as you like.

2 · The mark

You are right that it joins the dots. It just does it silently.

The joining is currently implied by a square frame — and that square is also what makes the mark read as a camera at favicon size. Draw the joins instead of implying them and the idea gets louder, the camera read disappears, and there is room for the colour to mean something: one hue per node, matching the line types in your own architecture legend.

Previous · retired

60px
30px
16px
on dark

The joins are only implied — by a square frame, which is also what makes it read as a camera at small size. Four identical dots in three colours, so the colour cannot mean anything. On dark, the navy half vanishes.

A · Spokes

60px
30px
16px
on dark

Ring kept, square dropped, and the joins actually drawn. Same idea, said out loud. Four colours, one per node, and the camera read is gone with the square.

B · Route

60px
30px
16px
on dark

An open path threading four nodes through the record at the centre. Open rather than closed, because a square is a frame and a path is a route.

C · Constellation adopted

60px
30px
16px
on dark

Nodes off the corners, different sizes, uneven joins, the person largest. The most colourful of the three and the least machine-made, because nothing lines up.

All three keep four nodes, a centre and visible connection. None is a replacement — they are the same mark with the joins drawn and the frame removed. C is the one a generator would never produce, because nothing in it lines up.

3 · Colour

More of it, and each one doing a job.

The problem was never that you use colour. It is that mint teal, coral and navy on cool grey is the exact triad every generator reaches for, and that the three are sprinkled decoratively. Push the hues off the default, add a fourth, and tie each to something real — the line types already in your module map.

Now
#3ECFBEMint tealthe default accent
#F07043Coraldecorative
#1D3461Navyprimary
#F7FAFCCool greythe default paper
Proposed
#00B8A6Teal, pushedperson and record
#7B61FFVioletthe golden thread
#FFB020Amberflow and operations
#FF5B47Coral, hotterentry and escalation
#141C2EInkeverything structural

Brighter, not quieter. The difference from today is that a reader can work out why a thing is violet, and violet appears where the golden thread does rather than wherever a fourth colour was needed.

4 · Type

Newer, not older. No serif in sight.

Inter with a tracked mono eyebrow is the fingerprint. The fix is a grotesque with actual character — still modern, still geometric, just not the one every generator defaults to. Three pairings, sharpest first:

Space Grotesk / Instrument Sans

Stop buying systems.
Run one.

One open record carrying clinical, operational and governance data in a single platform you host yourself.

Sharpest. The single-storey a and the cut g are unmistakable, and nobody would take it for Inter.

Familjen Grotesk / Archivo

Stop buying systems.
Run one.

One open record carrying clinical, operational and governance data in a single platform you host yourself.

Warmer. Modern grotesque with a bit of humanity in it — a good fit for care rather than crypto.

Archivo / Archivo

Stop buying systems.
Run one.

One open record carrying clinical, operational and governance data in a single platform you host yourself.

Safest. Solid, contemporary, more neutral; the least risk and the least personality of the three.

This page is set in the first pairing so you can read it at length rather than in a specimen box. The eyebrow also changes shape: a filled pill instead of tracked uppercase mono with a dot.

5 · The writing

The one thing from round one that still stands.

The negation habit is my fingerprint on your copy, and it survives any palette. “Not a roadmap and not a prototype.” “Record-first, not AI-first.” Seventy-one of them.

Now

Not a roadmap and not a prototype. The platform is complete across primary care, community, mental health, social care, acute and governance — on one record, in one codebase, deployable on infrastructure you own.

Rewritten

You can log in this afternoon. Primary care, community, mental health, social care, acute and governance all run today, on one record, in one codebase, on your own infrastructure.

6 · In order

Two of these do most of the work.

  1. Change the typeface. One pairing, applied across site, deck and explainers. Biggest single change, and it touches nothing you are attached to.
  2. Shift the hues and give them jobs. Same amount of colour, different values, each tied to a line type from your own map. Half a day of token edits.
  3. Draw the joins in the mark. A, B or C, or none — the idea is already right, so this is refinement, not replacement.
  4. Break the section rhythm. Half the screens should not be eyebrow, headline, lead, grid. One full-bleed, one single sentence, one table.
  5. Edit the two copy tics. Mechanical, about two hours, reviewable as a diff.

Say which mark and which pairing and I will apply it across the site, the decks and the explainers in one pass, so nothing is left half-changed.

commvita™ brand, round two · set in Space Grotesk and Instrument Sans, four working colours, joins drawn.

© 2026 Commvita Digital Health Solutions Ltd. All rights reserved.